J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pomp, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wesolowski, S. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pomp, D.
Right arrow Articles by Wesolowski, S. R.
J. Anim. Sci. 2004. 82:E300-E312
© 2004 American Society of Animal Science

Quantitative genomics: Exploring the genetic architecture of complex trait predisposition1,2

D. Pomp3, M. F. Allan and S. R. Wesolowski

Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583-0908

3 Correspondence: A218 Animal Science (phone: 402-472-6416; fax: 402-472-6362; e-mail: dpomp{at}unlnotes.unl.edu).

Most phenotypes with agricultural or biomedical relevance are multifactorial traits controlled by complex contributions of genetics and environment. Genetic predisposition results from combinations of relatively small effects due to variations within a large number of genes, known as QTL. Well over 200 QTL have been reported for growth and body composition traits in the mouse, which likely represent at least 50 to 100 distinct genes. Molecular biology has yielded significant advances in understanding these traits at the metabolic and physiological levels; however, little has been learned regarding the identity and nature of the underlying polygenes. In addition to the significantly poor precision inherent to QTL localization, it is very difficult to differentiate between co-localization and coincidence when comparing QTL with other QTL and with potential candidate genes. The wide gap between our knowledge of physiological mechanisms underlying complex traits and the nature of genetic predisposition significantly impairs discovery of genes underlying QTL. Identification and genetic mapping of key transcriptional, proteomic, metabolomic, and endocrine events will uncover large lists of significant positional candidate genes for growth and body composition. However, integration of experimental approaches to jointly evaluate predisposition and physiology will increase success of QTL identification by merging the power of recombination with functional analysis. Measuring physiologically relevant subphenotypes within a structured QTL mapping population will not only facilitate pathway-specific prioritization among candidate genes, but may also directly identify genes underlying QTL. This would advance our understanding of the genetic architecture of complex traits by testing the central hypothesis that genes controlling predisposition to a quantitative trait are primarily involved in trans-regulation of the primary physiological pathways that regulate the trait.

Key Words: Body Fat • Body Weight • Complex Traits • Gene Expression • Genetic Architecture • Quantitative Trait Loci




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. D. Green
ASAS Centennial Paper: Future needs in animal breeding and genetics
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 793 - 800.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. M. Sellner, J. W. Kim, M. C. McClure, K. H. Taylor, R. D. Schnabel, and J. F. Taylor
BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Applications of genomic information in livestock
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3148 - 3158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
G. J. M. Rosa, N. de Leon, and A. J. M. Rosa
Review of microarray experimental design strategies for genetical genomics studies
Physiol Genomics, December 13, 2006; 28(1): 15 - 23.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
J. G. Swallow, J. S. Rhodes, and T. Garland Jr.
Phenotypic and Evolutionary Plasticity of Organ Masses in Response to Voluntary Exercise in House Mice
Integr. Comp. Biol., June 1, 2005; 45(3): 426 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
N. C. Jerez-Timaure, E. J. Eisen, and D. Pomp
Fine mapping of a QTL region with large effects on growth and fatness on mouse chromosome 2
Physiol Genomics, May 11, 2005; 21(3): 411 - 422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. R. Caetano, R. K. Johnson, J. J. Ford, and D. Pomp
Microarray Profiling for Differential Gene Expression in Ovaries and Ovarian Follicles of Pigs Selected for Increased Ovulation Rate
Genetics, November 1, 2004; 168(3): 1529 - 1537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. Walsh and D. Henderson
Microarrays and beyond: What potential do current and future genomics tools have for breeders?
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E292 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society of Animal Science.